mhgintn's Blog
mhgintn's Profile
Share
Bookmark
Get your own free blog
Abortions and Birth Certificates:Obama's Soul Revealed
When someone implies that you’re crazy to continue to scrutinize the Obama Certifcate Of Live Birth issue, bring up the following evidence of Obama's and the Democrat Party's willingness to set aside the Constitution for their own empowerment.<p> While an Illinois legislator, Barack Obama worked on four occasions to cancel the Constitutional human rights of newly born alive human beings. He did this as a way to empower himself with the most radical left of the Democrat party. His method was to argue that 'if the Constitutional rights of newly born alive children were recognized then such would erode the power of Roe v Wade'!<p> With the current political campaign, Barack Obama and the Democrat Party are fighting tooth and nail to avoid submitting for We The People to inspect, the very background material which is required when applying for a job with a corporation, much less a top security position: the college records, the birth certificate, the working history, medical history, etc.<p> To top it all off, the way Barack Obama and the Democrat Party are dragging out this controversy over his eligibility, they are aligning the circumstances in such a way as to build up an extortion scenario, where the growing threat of violence and mayhem will be implicit in urging that We The People set aside the Constitutional requirements for someone to be running for President much less take the oath of office legitimately!<p> The way this man and his army of attorneys are handling this issue is a strong indication as to how he will handle any issue where the Constitution might be in opposition to what he wants to do, what powers he wants to assume, what strategic moves he wants to make! It is for that reason that We The People must, YES MUST, demand that this sneaky man and his political party be made to follow the Constitution regardless of the riots his sycophants may threaten and/or perpetrate.<p> Barack Hussein Obama (if that is in fact his real name) is a sneaky thuggish. He will ignore any law which is an inconvenience to his empowerment, just like he worked to cancel the Constitutional Rights of the most vulnerable newly born alive infants in Illinois, protecting the killing method of neglect as a way to slaughter newly born alive children.<p> Let me iterate that more succinctly: Barack Obama worked to cancel Constitutional Rights of newly born children as a means to empower himself (and perhaps protect the industry of fetal tissue harvesting which may have been a campaign contributor to him). He is right now working to cancel the Constitutional requirements for becoming President, using the implicit threat of violence --a threat which grows more imminent with every passing day he ignores the right of We The People to know the facts on him, and he is orchestrating that growing threat as the/a damned thug that he is-- in his campaign to have himself installed as president despite the illegitimacy of his election. He has also sent his minions to the media and Internet, to squelch a rising din over the issue, since the more aware the people are of this possible illegitimacy the less empowering are threats over rejection of him for illegitimacy.<p> If Barack Hussein Obama will work to cancel the rights of the most vulnerable in order to empower himself and/or his special interests, and Barack Obama will send out an army of attorneys to stonewall the vetting of him on eligibility issues, what is to stop such a thug from doing anything he wants with a democrat controlled Congress behind his empowerment? Elections have consequences. As we see clearly from his past actions, the Constitution is nothing more than a weak contract Obama ignores when it suits him to do so.<p>
A Missed Factor in PollingHere's a quick and simple study for why Obama will not reach the projected polling data. Let's first assume 10 democrat voters/votes from the 2006 elections and 9 Republican voters/votes. The Democrats won the '06 election by about that margin. Now, in that 10 votes for "D" candidates in '06 there were regular voters now being characterized as PUMAs (disgruntled Hillary Democrats). From the primaries of '08 we may say there are 5 PUMA voters. If 2 of those five are so pissed off at Obama's treatment of Hilalry that they will vote for McCain/Palin, that would be a conservative count. Let's see what that does to the election we're int he middle of. The 9 "R" voters might filter down to 8 "R" votes, just for comparisons ... we can't factor the broken glass Republicans who will vote this time but didn't bother in '06 because they were mad at the "R" for out of control spending, so the "R" might actually be 10 starting this calculation, but we'll stay with the 8 just to see what happens. The original 10 "D" have been cut to 8 due to the disgruntled and determined PUMAs, so the "D" votes are now 8. BUT, the "R" 8 now get 2 PUMA votes, so they move to 10! Obama loses the election but the loss cannot be predicted mathematically by polling because of the assumed "D" base of votes the pollsters use to start their calculations! For discussion, assume that the ACORN fraud votes will cancel the broken glass voters showing up this time that didn't bother to vote in '06. Smile, the Marxist isn't going to win this election, even with his army of cheating ACORNS.
The Real Face and Voice Of The Iraq War For FreedomThe following is the most watched Youtube video of this campaign. This soldier knows of what he speaks ... and he knows what real sacrifice is all about. This soldier speaks to Senator Obama:
Easy Way To Raise Your Electric BillsYou can easily raise your power bills, if you think you're not paying enough. Just vote for Obama, because in his own words, he has plans to skyrocket electric bills:
If You Are A Veteran or Are In The Military NowIf you are in active service or have been connected to our courageous military, please listen to this Marine speak from his heart: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAb5lMeSIIs
For The Hillary Supporters Contemplating ObamaHere's a revealing sketch of what Michelle and Barack think of you Hillary voters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsUnw5RDYoA
Reading For The Still 'Undecided' VoterHere is a link to encapsulated data for those who may still be undecided as to whom to vote for. I particularly recommend the comments from Thomas Sowell and Dr. Walter Williams near the end of the page:
Obama, in his own words, will skyrocket energy costsFolks, this guy will be a major disaster for this nation. His 'civic religion' includes a worship of 'global warming' and he believes we Americans must be forced by hardship to agree with his worldview, his 'civic religion'. Listen as Barack Obama tells us how he intends to drive the cost for energy through the roof, to force you to agree with him:
If You Live In Coal Country, This The Truth From Obama's MouthI live at the edge of coal country. For weeks, the Obama campaign has been televising ads which claim McCain doesn't like the coal industry and would harm it by vetoing things like the open (exposed balloting measure designed to remove secret voting from workers where unions want to take oveer the work force.
This video/audio is proof that Obama not only lies about his true intentions, he has told West Coast leftist what they want to hear about 'carbon credits' and ending 'dirty coal' use ... it all gives off carbon when burned, he wants that stopped:
Do We Want Obama To Have His Planned 'Brownshirts' To enforce his 'civic religionGive a look to the following Youtube. Barack Obama has plans for America, and they are looking astonishingly similar to those planned by the National Socialists of the thirties in pre-war Germany:
Click here to view: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwaAVJITx1Y</a>
Obama’s Campaign Is la |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2818 views | 
Permalink
Flag| Posted by mhgintn at 12:54 on November 1st, 2008 at 12:54PM | ||
A Parayer Of Mary
A POIGNANT POEM:
Posted by freeper, Ford Fairlane, a few years back during an abortion discussion.
A PRAYER OF MARY
You didn't make it, Unborn Child, they wouldn't let you be.
To your bud of life they took a knife … it's the New Morality.
They didn't mean to hurt you, Love, you have to understand.
Forgive them what they did to you, their life was so well-planned.
They couldn't take you with them up the ladder of success,
Money, it meant more to them than a child from heaven-blessed.
Tell me, little Unborn Child, what did Creator say?
Did He wrap you in his love and wipe your tears away?
You hover on the edge of time. I see your faceless form.
You laugh whenever children play, Oh God, for you I mourn!
He sent His only precious Son to teach us all The Way.
Still, we kill the unborn ones, it happens every day!
You didn't make it, Unborn Child. They wouldn't let you be.
They just expunged a blob of cells…. It's the New Morality.
| Posted by mhgintn at 14:38 on October 31st, 2008 at 2:38PM | ||
Forgiveness, God's Way
Two little brothers fought and bickered all day long. Every time their mother turned around, these boys were at each other, bickering. Came bedtime and the youngest was bathed and put to bed. As the older brother was getting his bath, his mother worked on his conscience, asking how he would feel if he went to bed without making up and forgiving his brother and in the night his brother died? The oldest boy thought about it while the bath continued, then when mother was toweling him off he responded: "Okay. All right, I'll forgive him ... But if he's alive in the morning ..."
That's the way most of us forgive. I'm so glad God 'remembers no more' our sin when we come to Him for forgiveness. He's had a lot to forget with me. ;^)
What/Who IS Barack Hussein Obama?
Asked by Pastor Rick Warren ‘when BABIES get human rights‘--that‘s Constitutional Rights--Obama switched the focus to conception issues. Why? Because he has a history of using summary removal of Constitutional rights from newborns as his means to protect abortion rights in Illinois.
Barack Obama is more than willing to cancel Constitutionally defined Human rights in order to protect what the Democrat Party has used as their empowerment scheme, for decades.
In the following clip from the Saddleback Church interview, Pastor Warren didn‘t ask about a fetus--the pre-born baby--or about issues of ‘when a conceptus becomes a human being‘, he asked when a baby--an already born, alive human entity--gets human rights: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRswgN-Wf6g&feature=related.
Notice how Barack Obama answers first that it is above his pay grade, trying to divert the focus to an issue which continues to confound debate. That’s sleight of hand, trickery, obfuscation. Why? … Because while he was in the Illinois legislature, Barack Obama didn’t consider it above his pay grade to cancel the Constitutional Rights of newborn, alive babies as his means to protect abortion ’rights’!
Pastor Warren asked Obama a question which would have exposed a darkness at the heart of the man, had Obama answered truthfully. So Barack Obama played bait and switch, deceived the audience, lied. He does this regularly, but the sycophantic leftist media never calls him on his lies.
Obama twisted the focus of Warren’s question, as a way to avoid exposing his Constitution-cancelling past performance. Killing born alive infants is okay in Barack Obama‘s twisted mind, so long as it protects abortion on demand! But he knows that would be a major turn-off for average Americans, so he lies.
On the other hand, Barack Obama made noises about being his brother’s keeper, and quoted scripture (from Matthew, which he may never have actually read for himself) regarding ‘doing to the least of these’. Had Barack Obama ever actually read the Gospel according to Matthew, he would know that Jesus considers children also as ‘the least of these‘.
Alive, born and separated from their mother‘s body children are the least among us. Obama had no problem with cancelling the rights of these alive children, as his means to protect the rites of abortion and thus empower his political capital among pro-choice Democrats.
Deceit is so deeply ingrained with Barack Obama, one is left pondering from whence comes such deception? How can a man claim to care about the least among us, yet purposely cancel the Constitutional Rights, the Human Rights of struggling-to-breathe newborn children?
If I’m not mistaken, abortion ‘rights’ are about killing the alive unborn. But Obama protected the killing of alive just born children completely separated from the mother’s body, under the guise of protecting abortion rights.
Are we to conclude that killing the newborn is an abortion right?
If that were the only issue, the task of comprehending what is this man would be more simple. But there is so much more, as the Obama army’s character assassination of persons like Joe the Plumber prove.
Actually, the loud and clear message is more sinister from the Obama goons: ‘Do not question what Obama does or says. If Barack uses murdering of newborns as a means to protect abortion rights, he must not be questioned for it.’ Any evil is allowed, so long as it serves to sustain abortion on demand, even if the issue is not abortion but the legalization of killing newborns, the legalization of infanticide!
| Posted by mhgintn at 13:22 on October 30th, 2008 at 1:22PM | ||
A Right Catchy Presentation!
Here's an eight minute, very brilliant presentation from a Christian brother. ... Family is gonna make Heaven such an interesting place, meeting all these family members you didn't get to meet while on Earth! Enjoy ...
| Posted by mhgintn at 00:11 on October 30th, 2008 at 12:11AM | ||
Abortion and Barack Hussein Obama
Barack Obama sought to cancel the Constitutional Human Rights of born alive infants as Obama's means to 'protect' Roe v Wade and empower his political capital.
As a Constitutional law professor, we may be certain he knew what he was working to do when he opposed the born alive infant protection legislations. The form of killing alive children--that Obama protected--is called induced labor abortion. It is a method of forcing premature birth then killing the struggling completely born infant by neglecting medical attention, so the struggling child eventually suffocates. That is infanticide/murder via purposed neglect. ...
Please watch the following and forward the net address to all on your e-mail lists. Time is growing very short for our values: http://68.178.170.193/index.php
| Posted by mhgintn at 19:37 on October 29th, 2008 at 7:37PM | ||
Obama Constitution&Abortion
Barack Obama sought to cancel the Constitutional Human Rights of born alive infants as Obama's means to 'protect' Roe v Wade and empower his political capital.
As a Constitutional law professor, we may be certain he knew what he was working to do when he opposed the born alive infant protection legislations. The form of killing alive children--that Obama protected--is called induced labor abortion. It is a method of forcing premature birth then killing the struggling completely born infant by neglecting medical attention, so the struggling child eventually suffocates. That is infanticide/murder via purposed neglect. ...
And America's media is protecting this kind of man so he may become our elected president? THAT is the fourth estate turning into the fifth column enemy of the people.
Please watch the following and forward the net address to all on your e-mail lists. Time is growing very short for our values: http://68.178.170.193/index.php
| Posted by mhgintn at 10:40 on October 29th, 2008 at 10:40AM | ||
The SCOTUS IS Not RAdical Enough For Barack Obama's Agenda
During a 2001 radio call in session, the following remarks were recorded of Barack Obama answering questions on the socialist/Marxist perspective he desires for the nation and how the Courts haven't been radical enough to meet his desires. The transcript is part of a Bill Whittle essay that is included:
Barack Obama, in 2001:
<P>
You know, if you look at the victories and failures of the civil-rights
movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded
was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would
now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and
order and as long as I could pay for it, I’d be okay, but the Supreme Court
never entered into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and sort of more
basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.
<P>
And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize
the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the
essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the
Constitution — at least as it’s been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted
it in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative
liberties: [It] says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal
government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or
the state government must do on your behalf.
<P>
And that hasn’t shifted, and one of the, I think, the tragedies of the
civil-rights movement was because the civil-rights movement became so
court-focused, uh, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the
political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to
put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about
redistributive change. And in some ways we still suffer from that.
<P>
A caller then helpfully asks: “The gentleman made the point that the Warren
Court wasn’t terribly radical. My question is (with economic changes)… my
question is, is it too late for that kind of reparative work, economically, and
is that the appropriate place for reparative economic work to change place?”
<P>
Obama replies:
<P>
You know, I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive
change through the courts. The institution just isn’t structured that way.
[snip] You start getting into all sorts of separation of powers issues, you
know, in terms of the court monitoring or engaging in a process that essentially
is administrative and takes a lot of time. You know, the court is just not very
good at it, and politically, it’s just very hard to legitimize opinions from the
court in that regard.
<P>
So I think that, although you can craft theoretical justifications for it,
legally, you know, I think any three of us sitting here could come up with a
rationale for bringing about economic change through the courts.”
<P>
THE FIRST CIRCLE OF SHAME
There is nothing vague or ambiguous about this. Nothing.
<P>
From the top: “…The Supreme Court never entered into the issues of
redistribution of wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and
economic justice in this society. And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think
people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical.”
<P>
If the second highlighted phrase had been there without the first, Obama’s
defenders would have bent over backwards trying to spin the meaning of
“political and economic justice.” We all know what political and economic
justice means, because Barack Obama has already made it crystal clear a second
earlier: It means redistribution of wealth. Not the creation of wealth and
certainly not the creation of opportunity, but simply taking money from the
successful and hard-working and distributing it to those whom the government
decides “deserve” it.
<P>
This redistribution of wealth, he states, “essentially is administrative and
takes a lot of time.” It is an administrative task. Not suitable for the courts.
More suitable for the chief executive.
<P>
Now that’s just garden-variety socialism, which apparently is not a big deal
to may voters. So I would appeal to any American who claims to love the
Constitution and to revere the Founding Fathers… I will not only appeal to you,
I will beg you, as one American citizen to another, to consider this next
statement with as much care as you can possibly bring to bear: “And uh, to that
extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it
wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that
were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution — at least as it’s been
interpreted, and [the] Warren Court interpreted it in the same way, that
generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: [it] says what
the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you,
but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do
on your behalf.
<P>
The United States of America — five percent of the world’s population — leads
the world economically, militarily, scientifically, and culturally — and by a
spectacular margin. Any one of these achievements, taken alone, would be cause
for enormous pride. To dominate as we do in all four arenas has no historical
precedent. That we have achieved so much in so many areas is due — due entirely
— to the structure of our society as outlined in the Constitution of the United
States.
<P>
The entire purpose of the Constitution was to limit government. That
limitation of powers is what has unlocked in America the vast human potential
available in any population.
<P>
Barack Obama sees that limiting of government not as a lynchpin but rather as
a fatal flaw: “…One of the, I think, the tragedies of the Civil Rights
movement was because the Civil Rights movement became so court-focused, uh, I
think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community
organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual
coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change. And in
some ways we still suffer from that.”
<P>
There is no room for wiggle or misunderstanding here. This is not edited
copy. There is nothing out of context; for the entire thing is context — the
context of what Barack Obama believes. You and I do not have to guess at what he
believes or try to interpret what he believes. He says what he believes.
<P>
We have, in our storied history, elected Democrats and Republicans, liberals
and conservatives and moderates. We have fought, and will continue to fight,
pitched battles about how best to govern this nation. But we have never, ever in
our 232-year history, elected a president who so completely and openly opposed
the idea of limited government, the absolute cornerstone of makes the United
States of America unique and exceptional.
<P>
If this does not frighten you — regardless of your political affiliation —
then you deserve what this man will deliver with both houses of Congress, a
filibuster-proof Senate, and, to quote Senator Obama again, “a righteous wind at
our backs.”
<P>
That a man so clear in his understanding of the Constitution, and so
opposed to the basic tenets it provides against tyranny and the abuse of power,
can run for president of the United States is shameful enough.
<P>
We’re just getting started.
<P>
THE SECOND CIRCLE OF SHAME
Mercifully shorter than the first, and simply this: I happen to know the
person who found this audio. It is an individual person, with no more resources
than a desire to know everything that he or she can about who might be the next
president of the United States and the most powerful man in the world.
<P>
I know that this person does not have teams of highly paid professionals,
does not work out of a corner office in a skyscraper in New York, does not have
access to all of the subtle and hidden conduits of information … who possesses
no network television stations, owns no satellite time, does not receive
billions in advertising dollars, and has a staff of exactly one.
<P>
I do not blame Barack Obama for believing in wealth distribution. That’s his
right as an American. I do blame him for lying about what he believes. But his
entire life has been applying for the next job at the expense of the current
one. He’s at the end of the line now.
<P>
I do, however, blame the press for allowing an individual citizen to do the
work that they employ standing armies of so-called professionals for. I know
they are capable of this kind of investigative journalism: It only took them a
day or two to damage Sarah Palin with wild accusations about her baby’s
paternity and less time than that to destroy a man who happened to be playing
ball when the Messiah decided to roll up looking for a few more votes on the way
to the inevitable coronation.
<P>
We no longer have an independent, fair, investigative press. That is
abundantly clear to everyone — even the press. It is just another of the facts
that they refuse to report, because it does not suit them.
<P>
Remember this, America: The press did not break this story. A single citizen,
on the Internet did.
<P>
There is a special hell for you “journalists” out there, a hell made
specifically for you narcissists and elitists who think you have the right to
determine which information is passed on to the electorate and which is not.
<P>
That hell — your own personal hell — is a fiery lake of irrelevance, blinding
clouds of obscurity, and burning, everlasting scorn.
<P>
You’ve earned it.
<P>
THE THIRD CIRCLE OF SHAME
This discovery will hurt Obama much more than Joe the Plumber.
<P>
What will be left of my friend, and my friend’s family, I wonder, when the
press is finished with them?
<P>
— Bill Whittle lives in Los Angeles and is an on-air commentator for
www.pjtv.com. You can find him online at www.ejectejecteject.com.
So You Think Obama Is Not A Socialist
The linked to video is actually audio captured from a 2001 radio interview with Barack Obama. If you listen to the exchanges and following the written quotes, Barack Obama is obviously discussing a topic for which he has spent a lot of time contemplating just how to bring about 'redistribution' of wealth and power. If he reaches the presidency, you will find out what that means because Barack Obama is a flatout Marxist. His achievement will be the realization of William Ayers' dreams for America.
Here's the video link:
<img src=http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck>
| Posted by mhgintn at 20:36 on October 26th, 2008 at 8:36PM (updated Oct 26th, 2008) | ||
Message From An Elderly Cuban
A STORY FROM A CUBAN FELLOW - THINK ABOUT THIS !!!!!!!!
Each year I get to celebrate Independence Day twice.
On June 30 I celebrate MY independence day and on July 4 I celebrate
America’s.
This year is special, because it marks the 40th anniversary
of my independence.
On June 30, 1968, I escaped Communist Cuba and a few months
later I was in the US to stay. That I happened to arrive in Richmond
on Thanksgiving Day is just part of the story, but I digress.
I’ve thought a lot about the anniversary this year. The election year
rhetoric has made me think a lot about Cuba and what transpired there.
In the late 1950’s most Cubans thought Cuba needed a change, and they
were right. So when a young leader came along, every Cuban was at
least receptive.
When the young leader spoke eloquently and passionately and denounced
the old system, the press fell in love with him. They never
questioned who his friends were or what he really believed in.
When he said he would help the farmers and the poor and bring free medical care and
education to all, everyone followed. When he said he would bring
justice and equality to all, everyone said ‘Praise the Lord.’ And
when the young leader said, ‘I will be for change and I’ll bring you
change,’ everyone yelled, ‘Viva Fidel! ‘
But nobody asked about the change, so:
*By the time the executioner’s guns went silent the people’s guns
had been taken away.
*By the time everyone was equal, they were equally poor, hungry, and
oppressed.
*By the time everyone received their free education it was worth
nothing.
*By the time the press noticed, it was too late, because theye were
now working for him.
*By the time the change was finally implemented Cuba had been knocked
down a couple of notches to Third-World status.
*By the time the change was over more than a million people had taken
to boats, rafts, and inner tubes.
You can call those who made it ashore anywhere else in the world the
most fortunate Cubans. And now I’m back to the beginning of my
story.
Luckily, we would never in America fall for a young leader who
promised change without asking, ‘WHAT change?
How will you carry it out? What will it cost America?’
Would we?
Manuel Alvarez, Jr
| Posted by mhgintn at 16:14 on October 25th, 2008 at 4:14PM (updated Oct 25th, 2008) | ||
Abortions and Birth Certificates:Obama's Soul Revealed, posted November 12th, 2008 A Missed Factor in Polling, posted November 4th, 2008 The Real Face and Voice Of The Iraq War For Freedom, posted November 3rd, 2008 Easy Way To Raise Your Electric Bills, posted November 3rd, 2008 If You Are A Veteran or Are In The Military Now, posted November 2nd, 2008 For The Hillary Supporters Contemplating Obama, posted November 2nd, 2008 Reading For The Still 'Undecided' Voter, posted November 2nd, 2008 Obama, in his own words, will skyrocket energy costs, posted November 2nd, 2008 If You Live In Coal Country, This The Truth From Obama's Mouth, posted November 2nd, 2008 Do We Want Obama To Have His Planned 'Brownshirts' To enforce his 'civic religion, posted November 2nd, 2008 Obama’s Campaign Is layered With Lies, posted November 1st, 2008, 3 comments A Parayer Of Mary, posted October 31st, 2008 Forgiveness, God's Way, posted October 31st, 2008, 1 comment What/Who IS Barack Hussein Obama?, posted October 30th, 2008, 2 comments A Right Catchy Presentation!, posted October 30th, 2008 Abortion and Barack Hussein Obama, posted October 29th, 2008, 2 comments Obama Constitution&Abortion, posted October 29th, 2008 The SCOTUS IS Not RAdical Enough For Barack Obama's Agenda, posted October 27th, 2008, 1 comment So You Think Obama Is Not A Socialist, posted October 26th, 2008 Message From An Elderly Cuban, posted October 25th, 2008 Television Reveals Our Deepest Nature, Sometimes, posted October 24th, 2008 Revolution You Can Believe In, posted October 23rd, 2008 Why Some Democrats Are Looking To Vote McCain, posted October 20th, 2008 Thank God For Sam Wurzelbacher, America’s Plumber, posted October 19th, 2008, 3 comments Is This Election America's Last Chance?, posted October 15th, 2008, 1 comment Some Say 'Don't Worry About The Election Results', posted October 13th, 2008, 2 comments Barack Obama, Nice Man?, posted October 12th, 2008 ACORN And Obama Are Closely Linked, posted October 11th, 2008 Obama An Indonesian Citizen, Not US Citizen, posted October 11th, 2008 Guilt By Association? Absadamnlutely!, posted October 9th, 2008 Both Parties Offer Change, Voters Have To Choose The Future Path, posted October 5th, 2008 There is power behind Barack Obama's campaign, posted October 3rd, 2008 Supreme Court Nominations Are Important In This Election, posted October 2nd, 2008 Neglecting premature alive children so they struggle and die, posted October 1st, 2008 The End IS Now In SIght, posted September 28th, 2008 After The First Debate, It's Already Over, posted September 27th, 2008 Financial Crisis Is A Winner For Republicans, posted September 21st, 2008, 1 comment Biden Isn't Gravitas, posted September 16th, 2008 The Falling Man, posted September 11th, 2008, 1 comment Barack Obama is more than just a defender of Roe v Wade, posted September 9th, 2008 Obama: Being There, Not, posted September 5th, 2008
Embed Photos
Embed Videos
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Be a part of the biggest social experience on the web. Where who you are is more important than who you know. Share what matters the most and find others who just "get it."
Join now and get started in seconds, or learn more about Experience Project
Today's Question:
What's The Most Unusual Way You've Met A Friend Or Significant Other?
A fun new question each day. Winners get trophies and points.
Respond and Vote Now!
Of course, we love to hear Your Story, whatever it happens to be. You can be yourself here!
|
|||||||||||||||
